Discussion about this post

User's avatar
CripesAmighty's avatar

Amazing what a country can do when it's not busy recycling mid-century Nazism and medieval magical thinking.

Expand full comment
Robert Spottswood, M.A.'s avatar

K.E. Boulding, late president of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) provided the most helpful context I have found for understanding the U.S. side of the situation you articulated well.

In his presidential address to the AAAS he noted the historically shared values underlying both the subcultures of science and democracy.

I.e., to undercut democracy, we will also be attacking the ethical foundations of scientific inquiry.

His list of five shared values he attributes to the gradual struggle of both subcultures to emerge from under the deadly opposition of king and pope:

-- veracity; the attempt to tell the truth as best we can

-- strong individualism; versus stereotyping by group

-- a commitment to testing of assumptions against the experience of others; this acts to balance the imperatives of individualism

-- curiosity; not really a popular value ("Curiosity killed the cat.")

-- rejection of the use of threat to change minds.

You can see how an economic system devoted almost exclusively to quarterly profit would have little direct motive to commit to extended support for either science or democracy.

Boulding's address is available online and in full from the Feb. 1980 issue of Science.

Thanks for this piece --

Robert in Vermont

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts